Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
bindery_journal_exceptions_workflow [2017/07/31 17:29]
skrash
bindery_journal_exceptions_workflow [2017/08/01 15:12]
skrash
Line 1: Line 1:
-**Bindery Journal Exceptions Workflow**+**Bindery Journal Exceptions Workflow**\\ 
 +for individuals tasked with reviewing exception requests
  
-EAST retention?+  * __EAST ​retention?__ Review bibliographic record to see if the journal has a retention committment;​ if so, binding is appropriate
  
-EDS Holdings Management+  * __Portico__ Check Portico to see if the titles shows a Status of "​Preserved";​ if Preserved, confirm that we have an online subscription and if not, give the information to the Acquisitions Coordinator to update subscription to online only, if available; we generally do not bind journals preserved in Portico 
 + 
 +  * __EBSCOadmin Holdings Management__ Review ​EDS Holdings Management ​to see where the journal is accessible; there will also be an indication for Open Access 
 + 
 +  * __Online__ If you cannot find a title in EBSCOadmin or Portico, look in Ulrich'​s to determine status of publication;​ for titles determined to be Open Access, go online and confirm that you can get to the content 
 + 
 +  * After review of all of the above, and in consideration of availability of binding funds, a determination will be made as to whether or not to bind. 
  
-Portico 
  
-Online 
bindery_journal_exceptions_workflow.txt · Last modified: 2020/11/23 18:23 by mbanach
[unknown link type]Back to top
www.chimeric.de Creative Commons License Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0