Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- bindery_journal_exceptions_workflow [2017/07/31 17:29]
skrash created
+++ bindery_journal_exceptions_workflow [2017/08/01 15:24]
skrash
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-**Bindery Journal Exceptions Workflow**
+**Bindery Journal Exceptions Workflow**\\
+for individuals tasked with reviewing exception requests
+  * [[https://east-retention-db.appspot.com/|EAST retention]]: Review EAST database there is a retention commitment; if so, binding is appropriate
+  * [[http://www.portico.org/|Portico]]: If there is not an EAST retention commitment, check the [[http://www.portico.org/digital-preservation/who-participates-in-portico/participating-titles|Portico Title List]] to see if the title shows a Status of "Preserved"; if Preserved, confirm that we have an online subscription and if not, give the information to the Acquisitions Coordinator to update subscription to online only, if available; we generally do not bind journals preserved in Portico
+  * [[http://admin.ebscohost.com/|EBSCOadmin]]: Review EBSCOadmin Holdings Management to see where the journal is accessible; there will also be an indication for Open Access
+  * __Online__ If you cannot find a title in EBSCOadmin or Portico, look in Ulrich's to determine status of publication; for titles determined to be Open Access, go online and confirm that you can get to the content
+  * After review of all of the above, and in consideration of availability of binding funds, a determination will be made as to whether or not to bind.
-EAST retention?
-EDS Holdings Management
-Portico
-Online